Your agents are only as good as the context you feed them.
Every GTM team is building AI agents for outbound, content, research, and deal analysis. The hard problem isn’t the model — it’s giving agents the right data, from the right sources, at the right time.
Amdahl pre-processes your GTM data into structured, cited intelligence before any agent touches it. 800K tokens of noise becomes 2K tokens of signal.
The problem
The fundamental issue isn’t the model. It’s the context.
Enterprise GTM data lives across 13+ tools. When teams build AI agents on top of that:
Agent reads 200 call transcripts from Gong API
→ 800K tokens
→ model attention degrades after ~30% of window
→ "lost in the middle" drops accuracy 30%+
→ agent hallucinates patterns from recency-biased sample
→ team ships content based on a miragesiloed across tools, no unified schema
each enterprise employee uses daily
of organizational data never crosses teams
Four problems. Four fixes.
Context windows don't scale
Even 1M-token models reason effectively over only 30–60% of their window. Accuracy drops 30%+ when key info sits in the middle. Your 200 call transcripts become 800K tokens of noise where the model sees the beginning, the end, and hallucinates the rest.
Pre-processed intelligence fits in 2K tokens
The same 200 calls run through a pipeline: PCA dimensionality reduction, UMAP embedding, recursive sub-clustering with JSD divergence scoring. Output: 120 measured clusters. A query returns the relevant cluster with exact quotes, deal correlations, and trend data — ~2K tokens with room for reasoning.
RAG retrieves chunks, not answers
"What objections are trending?" returns 5 random chunks mentioning "objection." "Which accounts show buying signals?" returns CRM note fragments with no cross-referencing. These aren't retrieval problems — they're analysis problems that require counting, correlating, and clustering across thousands of conversations.
10 ML classifiers per message, pre-computed
Every message is tagged across 10 dimensions before any query runs: sentiment, topics, personas, intent, entities, competitors, psychographics, quality, relationships, and vector embeddings. Chi-squared feature scoring identifies statistically significant patterns. Your agent queries pre-computed intelligence, not raw text.
RAG and knowledge graph failure is mathematically inevitable
Formal proofs show any system retrieving by semantic similarity will suffer forgetting and false recall as the knowledge base grows. This isn't a tuning problem. It's a geometric property of how meaning is represented. Knowledge graphs fail too — tested across five architectures, none escape.
Structured facts that don't degrade at scale
The research identifies one viable path: pair semantic retrieval with exact structured records. Amdahl pre-computes cluster hierarchies with confidence scores (0–1), deal-outcome correlations, and verbatim quotes linked to source transcripts. The structured output is the episodic record — your agent searches it semantically, but the underlying facts are exact.
Enterprise data lives in 13+ tools
CRM in HubSpot. Calls in Gong. Tickets in Zendesk. Threads in Slack. 90% unstructured, no unified schema, 50%+ never shared across teams. Each tool holds a partial view. Your agent gets a partial answer.
One schema, every source, 67-second freshness
OAuth 2.0 connectors ingest from 13+ sources into a unified interactions table. Speaker attribution maps messages to CRM contacts. Deal metadata (stage, amount, outcome) joins at ingest time. 67-second sync lag from source system to queryable index via MCP or REST API.
The math
800K tokens of noise vs. 2K tokens of signal.
That’s not a prompt engineering problem. It’s an infrastructure problem.
Today
200 call transcripts
Accuracy: unreliable
With Amdahl
1 cited cluster + quotes
Accuracy: cited & verified
Same 200 calls. Different approaches.
- 200 calls × 4,000 tokens = 800K tokens
- Exceeds most context windows
- Lost-in-the-middle degrades accuracy 30%+
- No structure, no citations
- Plausible but unreliable output
- Same calls → pipeline → 120 clusters
- Relevant cluster: ~2K tokens
- Exact quotes, deal outcomes, trends
- Fits in context with room for reasoning
- Cited, measured, verifiable output
What comes out the other side
Structured intelligence with citations.
Not documents. Not chunks. Every answer is measured, every claim is cited, every pattern is traced to specific conversations and deals.
Example cluster output
{
"cluster": "Security compliance concerns in enterprise deals",
"trend": "+34% quarter-over-quarter",
"confidence": 0.89,
"deal_correlation": "present in 73% of closed-won enterprise deals",
"representative_quotes": [
{
"text": "We can't move forward without SOC 2 documentation",
"speaker": "VP Engineering, Acme Corp",
"deal": "$180K ARR, Stage 4",
"sentiment": "blocker"
}
],
"related_clusters": ["procurement_process", "data_residency"]
}We can't move forward without SOC 2 documentation[1]
This is what an agent can reason about. Not 200 raw transcripts — a structured, measured, cited answer to a specific question.
The pipeline
Not a wrapper on an LLM. A real data pipeline.
10 pipeline stages. Runs in BigQuery, tenant-isolated at the dataset level. Deterministic outputs — same input produces same enrichment. SOC 2 Type II certified.
Replicate
OAuth 2.0, 13+ sources, 67s lag
Unify
Single schema, speaker attribution, CRM join
Enrich
10 ML classifiers per message
Discover
PCA → UMAP → recursive clustering
The interface — MCP + API
MCP + REST API. Your agent connects in minutes.
MCP for any compatible client (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf). REST API for custom agents and integrations. Same intelligence layer, two access patterns.
data exploreSchema + sample values
data querySQL over interactions
data searchSemantic search
data cluster_searchPattern discovery
context askCited answers
content generateVoice-matched content
Why this matters now
Three things are converging.
Agents are going mainstream
Every GTM team is building or buying AI agents for content, outbound, research, and analysis. The question isn’t whether — it’s how well they work.
Context windows aren’t scaling fast enough
Even at 1M tokens, effective reasoning caps at 30–60% of the window. Enterprise data sets are orders of magnitude larger. The gap is widening.
Better data beats better prompts
When every team has the same foundation models, the differentiator is the quality of information those models can access. Context engineering is the job.
The companies that build a real intelligence layer — not just RAG, not just a vector database, but a structured, pre-analyzed, continuously-updated understanding of their customers — will have agents that actually work. Everyone else will have agents that hallucinate confidently.
Connects to your tools in minutes. Pipeline starts immediately. Your agents get structured intelligence via MCP or API.